Request a new model

Tell us which model you want measured. We review every request.

LLM

Benchmarks

X
Y

Task done

higher is better

Did the agent finish the job without doing damage — look the order up, refund the right amount, and leave alone what it must not touch?

GeminiTry →94.74%
BasetenTry →93.16%
Try →92.63%
Try →91.75%
Try →90.88%
Try →89.12%
GeminiTry →86.84%
BasetenTry →86.84%
CerebrasTry →86.14%
GeminiTry →85.79%
Hopper85.26%
TogetherTry →84.21%
Try →83.51%
AnthropicTry →83.33%
Anthropic82.46%
BasetenTry →82.19%
CerebrasTry →82.02%
Try →81.93%
AnthropicTry →81.67%
BasetenTry →80.88%
BasetenTry →80.53%
ITry →80.53%
Try →77.02%
Try →75.61%
Try →75.61%
Try →75.61%
TogetherTry →54.30%
Try →30.61%
0%25%50%75%100%

Consistency

higher is better

Same task, five tries. The share of scenarios the agent got right every single time.

Fabrication

lower is better

The agent states a fact it was never given — an opening time, a delivery window, a policy. It sounds confident and it is invented.

Spoken leaks

lower is better

Share of calls where the caller heard text meant for the system: a tool call, JSON, or the model's own reasoning, read aloud.

Silent turns

lower is better

How often the caller hears nothing at all — every turn counted, not just the ones where a tool runs. The small number is the narrower measure: the share of tool calls the agent made in complete silence, which for 11 of the 26 measured models is all of them.

AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5Try →2%3% of tool calls5 of 252 turns
BasetenGLM-4.7Try →6%10% of tool calls16 of 268 turns
qwen-turboTry →33%100% of tool calls ≥69%49 of 149 turns
TogetherDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashTry →34%50% of tool calls109 of 318 turns
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5Try →35%53% of tool calls101 of 292 turns
BasetenDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashTry →37%53% of tool calls117 of 320 turns
BasetenDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Try →37%53% of tool calls116 of 315 turns
CerebrasQwen3.8-27BTry →43%62% of tool calls139 of 320 turns
TogetherLlama-3.3-70BTry →49%100% of tool calls ≥82%94 of 194 turns
Grok-4.3Try →57%87% of tool calls165 of 290 turns
AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.559%89% of tool calls177 of 299 turns
gpt-4.1-miniTry →61%97% of tool calls167 of 272 turns
gpt-4.1Try →62%98% of tool calls166 of 270 turns
gpt-5.4-miniTry →62%99% of tool calls166 of 267 turns
Geminigemini-3.5-flash-liteTry →63%99% of tool calls173 of 274 turns
Hoppergemma-4-31b64%91% of tool calls174 of 273 turns
gpt-5.6-terraTry →64%99% of tool calls181 of 283 turns
BasetenNemotron-3-UltraTry →64%96% of tool calls195 of 304 turns
Geminigemini-3.7-flashTry →65%100% of tool calls ≥82%182 of 282 turns
Geminigemini-3.8-flashTry →66%100% of tool calls ≥82%190 of 290 turns
gpt-5.6-lunaTry →68%100% of tool calls216 of 317 turns
gpt-5Try →70%100% of tool calls ≥82%223 of 321 turns
Basetengpt-oss-120bTry →70%100% of tool calls ≥82%224 of 319 turns
Cerebrasgpt-oss-120bTry →71%100% of tool calls ≥82%227 of 322 turns
gpt-5.2Try →71%100% of tool calls ≥82%245 of 345 turns
gpt-5-miniTry →72%100% of tool calls ≥82%238 of 331 turns
IMercury VoiceTry →73%100% of tool calls ≥82%244 of 335 turns
gpt-5-nanoTry →73%100% of tool calls ≥82%235 of 321 turns
0%25%50%75%100%

Time to first token

lower is better

How long a real agent turn — full system prompt and tools — takes to start answering.

Cost

lower is better

What the model charges for a million tokens of its own output, at each vendor's published list price.

Real-call success

higher is better

Share of full calls handled cleanly: the caller got what they called for, was told the true outcome, and never heard a tool call read aloud. Callers change their minds and tools sometimes fail.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 589%↓ Front desk 72
BasetenDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash88%↓ Front desk 78
Hoppergemma-4-31b87%↓ Payments 78
TogetherDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash86%↓ Front desk 75
CerebrasQwen3.8-27B86%↓ Orders 78
AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.586%↓ Front desk 67
Geminigemini-3.7-flash85%↓ Scheduling 75
gpt-581%↓ Intake 61
gpt-5.4-mini80%↓ Intake 67
BasetenNemotron-3-Ultra78%↓ Intake 56
gpt-4.178%↓ Front desk 64
gpt-5.6-luna78%↓ Intake 64
BasetenGLM-4.777%↓ Intake 61
gpt-5-nano76%↓ Scheduling 67
Grok-4.375%↓ Intake 56
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.574%↓ Intake 64
Basetengpt-oss-120b73%↓ Front desk 61
Geminigemini-3.5-flash-lite71%↓ Intake 25
gpt-4.1-mini69%↓ Intake 61
Cerebrasgpt-oss-120b53%↓ Intake 8
qwen-turbo33%↓ Intake 3

FAQ

What is the best LLM for a real-time voice agent?
Gemini gemini-3.5-flash-lite led with a 94.74% graded task score, including partial credit, while giving no spoken lead-in on most tool-call turns. Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 scored 81.67% and omitted a spoken lead-in on 3.3% of tool-call turns.
Which LLM has the lowest first-token latency?
Cerebras gpt-oss-120b had the lowest US East vendor-direct first-output median on a full agent turn (system prompt and tools) at 139ms. In the separate task benchmark, it gave no spoken lead-in on 100.0% of tool-call turns.
How fast does an LLM need to respond for voice?
On a full agent turn, US East vendor-direct first-output p50s range from 139ms (Cerebras gpt-oss-120b) to 2.41s (OpenAI gpt-5-nano). Turn detection and speech synthesis add to the caller's wait.
Which LLMs fabricate answers in a voice agent?
Fabrication is inventing a policy or fact the agent was never given. OpenAI gpt-4.1-mini measured 3% on out-of-policy questions and Alibaba qwen-turbo 90%, while Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 measured 3%.
What is dead air in a voice agent?
Dead air is a turn where the caller receives no speech. Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 produced dead air on 2.0% of turns, compared with 70.5% for Cerebras gpt-oss-120b.